IRONCLAW BTC Node vs Riveter

In-depth architectural comparison of the IRONCLAW BTC Node and Riveter MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose IRONCLAW BTC Node when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore IRONCLAW BTC Node Details

R

Choose Riveter when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Riveter Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	IRONCLAW BTC Node Search & Data Extraction	R Riveter Search & Data Extraction
Summary	Real BTC full node: fees, mempool, txs, portfolio, trace, whales, SEC, scraping, Reddit via x402.	MCP server for Riveter's enrichment, scraping, and monitoring API
Category & Scope	Search & Data Extraction	Search & Data Extraction

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ironclaw-btc-node": {
      "url": "https://img.shields.io/badge/License-MIT-green.svg"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "riveter-2": {
      "url": "https://docs.riveterhq.com/"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons