What is the key difference between Ipybox and Stigmer?

Ipybox belongs to the Cloud Platforms category with local stdio execution, while Stigmer belongs to the Cloud Platforms category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install Ipybox or Stigmer in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Ipybox and Stigmer free or paid?

Ipybox operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Stigmer operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Ipybox lists 0 tools with 0 views and 73 GitHub stars. Stigmer lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Ipybox and Stigmer together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Ipybox vs Stigmer

In-depth architectural comparison of the Ipybox and Stigmer MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Ipybox

Cloud Platforms · Local stdio

Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Stigmer

Cloud Platforms · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 36/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Ipybox if you need specialized Cloud Platforms tools running via a local process. Choose Stigmer if your workspace requires Cloud Platforms integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Ipybox when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Cloud Platforms domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ipybox Details

Choose Stigmer when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Cloud Platforms domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Stigmer Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Ipybox Cloud Platforms	Stigmer Cloud Platforms
Summary	An MCP server for sandboxed Python code execution with IPython and Docker, and file transfer.	Execution graph of AWS: verified method contracts, IAM permissions, and least-privilege policies.
Category & Scope	Cloud Platforms	Cloud Platforms
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ipybox Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Stigmer Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Ipybox Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ipybox": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "ipybox"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Stigmer Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "stigmer": {
      "url": "https://stigmer.network/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Ipybox is categorized under Cloud Platforms and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Stigmer belongs to Cloud Platforms using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Ipybox when you need capabilities focused on cloud platforms and Stigmer when you require tools for cloud platforms.

More alternatives to Ipybox More alternatives to Stigmer Cloud Platforms category hub