In-depth architectural comparison of the Iplookup and Servicegraph MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Iplookup
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 51/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Servicegraph
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 45/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Iplookup if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Servicegraph if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
I
Choose Iplookup when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Look up an IP address to find its location and network details. Returns country, region, city, coordinates, timezone, ISP, and AS number. Use when you need to identify where a user or server is located.
batch_geolocate
Look up locations for up to 100 IP addresses at once. Returns geolocation and ISP data in the same order as input. Use for analyzing multiple IPs efficiently.
Servicegraph Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Iplookup is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Servicegraph belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Iplookup when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Servicegraph when you require tools for developer tools.