IOS Web Bluetooth (WebBLE) vs Beacio SDK MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the IOS Web Bluetooth (WebBLE) and Beacio SDK MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose IOS Web Bluetooth (WebBLE) when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore IOS Web Bluetooth (WebBLE) Details

Choose Beacio SDK MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Beacio SDK MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	IOS Web Bluetooth (WebBLE) Developer Tools	Beacio SDK MCP Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server to ship Web Bluetooth on iPhone Safari via the WebBLE extension.	MCP server for Web Bluetooth on iOS Safari: scaffolding, UUID lookup, extension detection.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ios-web-bluetooth-webble": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "beacio"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-63": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "beacio"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons