InvoiceXML vs Tallystick

In-depth architectural comparison of the InvoiceXML and Tallystick MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose InvoiceXML when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore InvoiceXML Details

T

Choose Tallystick when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Tallystick Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	InvoiceXML Developer Tools	T Tallystick Developer Tools
Summary	Create, validate, convert & extract compliant e-invoices (UBL, Factur-X, ZUGFeRD, XRechnung)	Read, validate and write e-invoices on your own machine. XRechnung, ZUGFeRD, Factur-X, UBL, CII.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "invoicexml": {
      "url": "https://modelcontextprotocol.io"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tallystick": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "tallystick"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons