Instagram Data vs StoriesIG Instagram M… | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Instagram Data vs StoriesIG Instagram MCP Server
In-depth architectural comparison of the Instagram Data and StoriesIG Instagram MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Instagram Data
Social Media · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
StoriesIG Instagram MCP Server
Social Media · Local stdio
Quality: 28/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Instagram Data if you need specialized Social Media tools running via a local process. Choose StoriesIG Instagram MCP Server if your workspace requires Social Media integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
I
Choose Instagram Data when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Instagram Data is categorized under Social Media and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, StoriesIG Instagram MCP Server belongs to Social Media using local stdio subprocess. Select Instagram Data when you need capabilities focused on social media and StoriesIG Instagram MCP Server when you require tools for social media.