The full upstream README, mirrored here for reference. Install config, tool schemas, adoption signals, and an original overview live on the Inspo listing page.
Real production websites your coding agent can study, over MCP, before it writes UI. inspomcp.dev
Same brief, same model, no design skill on either run. The only difference: the page on the right was built with Inspo MCP on the session.
That gap is the product. Agents have tools but not taste, and the open web already holds every reference they need: Inspo assembles, tags, and addresses it.
Fifteen tools expose all of it; recommend(brief) composes most of them into one call. The full tool table lives in apps/mcp/README.md.
find_similar.npx -y inspo-mcp install (detects Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, VS Code, Windsurf, Zed, Claude Desktop and writes the config; --dry-run shows the plan)claude mcp add --transport http inspo https://inspomcp.dev/api/mcpgit clone https://github.com/Nutlope/inspo.git && cd inspo && pnpm installpnpm dev, then open localhost:3000pnpm --filter @inspo/mcp testPer-client snippets (Cursor, Windsurf, Zed, Claude Desktop) are on the MCP page; the self-host runbook is DEPLOY.md.
find_components returns a crop for every hitWant a site in the archive? Append it to apps/worker/src/seed-urls.ts and open a PR. The bar: does it make the archive better for someone building a website?
Every tool is read-only. The one path that touches the outside world - get_design_system(live:true), which supplements thin captured tokens from the screen's own source - passes each URL and redirect through an SSRF guard: public named hosts only, ports 80 and 443, byte-capped body, no JS execution. The hosted endpoint logs tool name, success and duration per call, never IPs or query text.
MIT, copyright Together AI and contributors. The screenshots remain the work of their designers: every screen credits and links its source, and takedowns are honoured at /dmca.