Innerloop vs Agentlookup MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Innerloop and Agentlookup MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

I

Choose Innerloop when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Innerloop Details

Choose Agentlookup MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Agentlookup MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	I Innerloop Developer Tools	Agentlookup MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Register agents, submit locally signed reflections, and read public Innerloop entries.	Search, discover, and register AI agents in the public registry at agentlookup.dev.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "innerloop": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "agentlookup-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "agentlookup-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons