What is the key difference between Inforcer and Sign Cli?

Inforcer belongs to the Security category with local stdio execution, while Sign Cli belongs to the Security category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Inforcer or Sign Cli in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Inforcer and Sign Cli free or paid?

Inforcer operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Sign Cli operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Inforcer lists 0 tools with 1 views and 0 GitHub stars. Sign Cli lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Inforcer and Sign Cli together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Inforcer vs Sign Cli

In-depth architectural comparison of the Inforcer and Sign Cli MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Inforcer

Security · Local stdio

Quality: 45/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Sign Cli

Security · Local stdio

Quality: 41/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Inforcer if you need specialized Security tools running via a local process. Choose Sign Cli if your workspace requires Security integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Inforcer when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Inforcer Details

Choose Sign Cli when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sign Cli Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Inforcer Security	Sign Cli Security
Summary	Read-only MCP server for Inforcer M365 baseline governance, plus assessment runs.	Agent-first e-signature MCP server with offline PAdES signing and hash-chained audit.
Category & Scope	Security	Security
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Inforcer Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Sign Cli Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Inforcer Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "inforcer-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "github:WYRE-AI/inforcer-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Sign Cli Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sign-cli": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@drbaher/sign-cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Inforcer is categorized under Security and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Sign Cli belongs to Security using local stdio subprocess. Select Inforcer when you need capabilities focused on security and Sign Cli when you require tools for security.

More alternatives to Inforcer More alternatives to Sign Cli Security category hub