Inferenceindexer MCP vs ReputeMap

In-depth architectural comparison of the Inferenceindexer MCP and ReputeMap MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

I

Choose Inferenceindexer MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_models, get_model, get_model_history.

Explore Inferenceindexer MCP Details

Choose ReputeMap when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_locations, list_reviews, get_review_stats.

Explore ReputeMap Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	I Inferenceindexer MCP Developer Tools	ReputeMap Developer Tools
Summary	AI inference pricing for agents: live and historical model prices, provider comparison.	Read and filter your Google Business Profile reviews, get stats, and send review requests.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "inferenceindexer-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "inferenceindexer-mcp",
        "--transport",
        "stdio"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "reputemap-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons