Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Inegi vs Uk Ons
In-depth architectural comparison of the Inegi and Uk Ons MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Inegi
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Uk Ons
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Inegi if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Uk Ons if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
I
Choose Inegi when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
U
Choose Uk Ons when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Inegi Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Uk Ons Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Inegi Configuration
Uk Ons Configuration