Imageat vs Templated

In-depth architectural comparison of the Imageat and Templated MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Imageat when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Imageat Details

Choose Templated when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Templated Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Imageat Developer Tools	Templated Developer Tools
Summary	Generate and edit images and videos with imageat.	Generate images, videos and PDFs from templates. Manage templates, folders, uploads and fonts.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "imageat": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/inspector"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "templated": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-server-templated"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons