Image Puma vs Froglet

In-depth architectural comparison of the Image Puma and Froglet MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

I

Choose Image Puma when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Image Puma Details

Choose Froglet when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Froglet Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	I Image Puma Developer Tools	Froglet Developer Tools
Summary	Plan and run local batch image preparation with explicit confirmation before writing files.	Run hosted proofs, signed receipts, service discovery, and local install planning.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "image-puma": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "image-puma"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "froglet": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "froglet-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons