Image Puma vs Builderforce

In-depth architectural comparison of the Image Puma and Builderforce MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

I

Choose Image Puma when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Image Puma Details

Choose Builderforce when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Builderforce Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	I Image Puma Developer Tools	Builderforce Developer Tools
Summary	Plan and run local batch image preparation with explicit confirmation before writing files.	Run tickets, boards, OKRs and cloud coding agents in your Builderforce workspace
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "image-puma": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "image-puma"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "builderforce": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "wrangler"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons