IlyaGusev Academia MCP vs Rainbowgore Stealthee… | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
IlyaGusev Academia MCP vs Rainbowgore Stealthee MCP Tools
In-depth architectural comparison of the IlyaGusev Academia MCP and Rainbowgore Stealthee MCP Tools MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
IlyaGusev Academia MCP
Search & Data Extraction · Local stdio
Quality: 56/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Rainbowgore Stealthee MCP Tools
Search & Data Extraction · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 48/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose IlyaGusev Academia MCP if you need specialized Search & Data Extraction tools running via a local process. Choose Rainbowgore Stealthee MCP Tools if your workspace requires Search & Data Extraction integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose IlyaGusev Academia MCP when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
IlyaGusev Academia MCP is categorized under Search & Data Extraction and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Rainbowgore Stealthee MCP Tools belongs to Search & Data Extraction using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select IlyaGusev Academia MCP when you need capabilities focused on search & data extraction and Rainbowgore Stealthee MCP Tools when you require tools for search & data extraction.