IGaming Tools vs Steam MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the IGaming Tools and Steam MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose IGaming Tools when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore IGaming Tools Details

S

Choose Steam MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Steam MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	IGaming Tools Gaming	S Steam MCP Server Gaming
Summary	Structured iGaming data: slot specs and RTP variants, demos and media kits, provider profiles, regulators, industry news and jobs — normalised and served through a JSON API and MCP.	Access Steam profiles, libraries, achievements, friends, news, and player statistics through MCP.
Category & Scope	Gaming	Gaming

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "igaming-tools": {
      "url": "https://mcp.i-gaming.tools/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "steam-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "steam-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons