A side-by-side look at the Idaho Code and Kentucky Code MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Idaho Code for legal work as a local process; choose Kentucky Code for legal as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Rows where the two servers differ are marked.
| Spec | I Idaho Code | K Kentucky Code |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Legal | Legal |
| Quality signal | 41/100 · Fair | 41/100 · Fair |
| Install command | Confirmed | Confirmed |
| Transport | Local subprocess (stdio) | Local subprocess (stdio) |
| Auth | No auth required | No auth required |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Required env vars | None listed | None listed |
| Verified owner | Community listing | Community listing |
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
{
"mcpServers": {
"idaho-code": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@pipeworx/mcp-idaho-code"
]
}
}
}
{
"mcpServers": {
"kentucky-code": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@pipeworx/mcp-kentucky-code"
]
}
}
}
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| Directory activity | 0 views 0 installs 0 upvotes | 0 views 0 installs 0 upvotes |
|---|
| Tools | Not listed | Not listed |
|---|
| Full listing | View Idaho Code | View Kentucky Code |
|---|