Ibanchecker MCP vs Vat

In-depth architectural comparison of the Ibanchecker MCP and Vat MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Ibanchecker MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ibanchecker MCP Details

V

Choose Vat when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: validate_vat, list_vat_formats.

Explore Vat Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Ibanchecker MCP Developer Tools	V Vat Developer Tools
Summary	IBAN validation, extraction, format specs and BIC/SWIFT lookup tools for AI assistants.	VAT-number format validation MCP (EU + UK/CH/NO).
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ibanchecker-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "wrangler"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "vat": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "vat"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons