Huntflow MCP vs Mango Office MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Huntflow MCP and Mango Office MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Huntflow MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Huntflow MCP Details

Choose Mango Office MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Mango Office MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Huntflow MCP Workplace & Productivity	Mango Office MCP Workplace & Productivity
Summary	MCP server for HuntFlow ATS API — vacancies, candidates, applicants for recruiting.	MCP server for Mango Office API — calls, users. 2 tools.
Category & Scope	Workplace & Productivity	Workplace & Productivity

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "huntflow-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@theyahia/huntflow-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mango-office-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@theyahia/mango-office-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons