Learns your writing voice locally and rewrites AI drafts so they sound like you.
Copy the AI prompt to install this server into Claude Code, Cursor, or another agent β or use 1-click editor setup below.
One-click editor setup isnβt available for this listing yet β we donβt have a confirmed install command, and weβd rather show nothing than point your editor at the wrong package or host. Follow the projectβs own setup instructions, linked above.
Make AI sound like you. Β· humanifyme.com
Try it in your browser β No install and no key: paste a few of your own messages and an AI draft, and get the draft back in your voice.
HumanifyMe learns how one specific person writes, then rewrites an AI agent's output in that person's voice before anyone reads it. Install it once and every agent on your machine β Claude Code, Cowork, Cursor β rewrites in the same voice. It is not "write better." It is "stop sounding like AI."
It runs locally. The only thing that crosses the network is a redacted draft sent to the LLM provider you choose.
Run the secure one-time setup first. It explains the privacy boundary, hides your provider key while you type it, validates the provider, collects three writing samples, builds your profile, and offers a first rewrite:
Want to see it work before installing? A live demo of the setup and rewrite flow is at humanifyme.com.
Never paste a provider key into an AI chat or pass it as a command-line flag. Then install the plugin from the bundled marketplace β no clone or build:
Then use /humanifyme:humanify on any draft, or let the bundled skills trigger
it after an agent drafts an email, PR, or message. The CLI and every installed
agent share the profile stored in ~/.humanifyme/. Use
/humanifyme:build-voice-profile later to add samples or rebuild it.
Tried it? Rate a rewrite: two dropdowns, and it is the feedback that improves voice matching most.
Run /reload-plugins if you installed mid-session. Using a different agent (Cursor, Continue, Cline, Windsurf, Zed, ChatGPT desktop) or the CLI? See Install.
Want to inspect a draft before setting up a profile? The analyzer is local, deterministic, and needs no API key:
It reports the exact phrases and punctuation it matched against the public 90-sign AI-writing checklist. It is an editing aid, not an AI detector; subjective signs stay labeled for human review instead of being turned into a fake probability.
People hand more of their writing to AI every day β commits, PR descriptions, Slack posts, email drafts β and every agent produces the same recognizable register: polished, balanced, faintly corporate. Recipients have learned to spot it. The usual fixes (Grammarly, Wordtune, "AI humanizers") push text toward a generic professional voice, which is the opposite of the goal.
Few-shot prompting alone cannot close the gap. A large 2025 study ran tens of thousands of generations across frontier models and hundreds of real authors and found that dropping a few samples into a prompt and asking a model to "write like me" hits a ceiling on casual voice (Wang et al., 2025). HumanifyMe's answer to that ceiling is a persistent, retrievable corpus of your writing plus a paraphrase-then-restyle rewrite β not a longer prompt.
MCP vs. plugin. MCP (Model Context Protocol) is the protocol HumanifyMe speaks, so any MCP-compatible agent can call its
humanify_texttool. A plugin is the packaging format (used by Claude Code and Cowork) that bundles the MCP server plus skills into one installable unit. You can install the plugin, or register the MCP server directly.
An agent calls one tool, humanify_text. Everything else happens on your machine.
The rewrite is paraphrase-then-restyle: strip the source style, re-render toward your learned voice, then run a deterministic gate no prompt can skip. The three pieces that carry the design:
src/engine/verify.ts runs five mechanical checks against the redacted draft: words the model introduced from your avoid-list, dropped numbers (dates, prices, versions), broken URLs, vanished redaction placeholders, and your learned casing register. Failures on the first attempt become instructions for one retry; survivors become user-facing "review before sending" notes. It never blocks output.~/.humanifyme/data.db, shared across every agent and project on your machine. The default embedder is offline and dependency-free; MiniLM and Ollama are opt-in, local-only upgrades.Deep dives: architecture & rewrite pipeline Β· voice memory & retrieval Β· data model.
HumanifyMe is bundled as a plugin in humanifyme.plugin/: a .claude-plugin/plugin.json manifest, an .mcp.json that registers the MCP server, and three skills (humanify, build-voice-profile, humanify-pr). The repo root ships a marketplace catalog at .claude-plugin/marketplace.json. The two-line install is in Quickstart.
The bundled .mcp.json launches the server from the published npm package via npx -y --package humanifyme@0.2.2 humanifyme-mcp, pinned to a known build, so the plugin works on a fresh machine with nothing checked out. Copy-paste setup for other agents is in docs/install/.
From npm, one command walks through privacy, provider, three samples, profile creation, and a first rewrite. API-key input is hidden and setup resumes from the last completed step if interrupted.
Contributing from a checkout requires Node 22.5 or newer:
If your agent does not use the plugin format, register the server directly:
The server exposes 16 humanify_* tools in one registry: the headline humanify_text, plus feedback and metrics, sample add/list/delete, profile get/build/update/delete, provider set, key test, audit list, wipe-all, and two importers. The same engine runs without MCP via the humanifyme CLI.
A four-register evaluation: four writers with distinct voices (casual lowercase, formal sentence-case, terse technical, warm enthusiastic), five generic-AI drafts each, rewritten with retrieval on and off β 20 rewrite pairs. Full method, raw numbers, and reproduction steps are in docs/proof/README.md. Run date 2026-06-24.

Attribution (a sanity check, not proof). Ask which of the four writers each retrieval-grounded rewrite lands closest to under a stylometric scorer: 17 of 20 (85%) land on their own writer. Be skeptical, because we are β the writers differ mostly by register, the scorer is eight coarse surface features, and every miss falls between the two lowercase writers. It shows the machinery does something; it is not evidence it reproduced anyone's idiolect.
Retrieval pulls the rewrite closer to the real writer for three of four writers this run (lower is closer). We report writer B even though retrieval hurt it β the metric is noisy and we are not rounding a loss into a win.
No reviews yet β be the first to share how this listing worked for you.
Showcase your server listing on GitHub or your project documentation. Embed this dynamic SVG badge to highlight official listing status and live engagement.
[](https://allmcps.com/mcp/humanifyme)<a href="https://allmcps.com/mcp/humanifyme"><img src="https://allmcps.com/api/badge/humanifyme?style=directory" alt="HumanifyMe on AllMCPs" /></a>