HumanHours vs Recruiter Roles MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the HumanHours and Recruiter Roles MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose HumanHours when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: track_event, get_summary, time_saved_report.

Explore HumanHours Details

R

Choose Recruiter Roles MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_jobs, get_job, list_companies.

Explore Recruiter Roles MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	HumanHours Developer Tools	R Recruiter Roles MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Track agent ROI and enrich companies via MCP. Remote, OAuth 2.1, no install or keys.	Search Recruiter Roles: live recruiter jobs, companies, sectors, locations, and market stats.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "humanhours": {
      "url": "https://humanhours.dev"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "recruiter-roles-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "recruiter-roles-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons