HumanHours vs Neural Draft

In-depth architectural comparison of the HumanHours and Neural Draft MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose HumanHours when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: track_event, get_summary, time_saved_report.

Explore HumanHours Details

N

Choose Neural Draft when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_brand, update_brand, register_component.

Explore Neural Draft Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	HumanHours Developer Tools	N Neural Draft Developer Tools
Summary	Track agent ROI and enrich companies via MCP. Remote, OAuth 2.1, no install or keys.	Neural Draft MCP — CMS, blog, bookings, commerce backend for AI-built sites. 30 tools, OAuth.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "humanhours": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "humanhours"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "neural-draft": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@neuraldraft/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons