Human Design MCP Server by RoxyAPI vs Bible MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Human Design MCP Server by RoxyAPI and Bible MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

H

Choose Human Design MCP Server by RoxyAPI when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Spirituality & Esoterica domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Human Design MCP Server by RoxyAPI Details

Choose Bible MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Spirituality & Esoterica domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: version, kind, miqweh.

Explore Bible MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	H Human Design MCP Server by RoxyAPI Spirituality & Esoterica	Bible MCP Spirituality & Esoterica
Summary	Human Design bodygraph, type, authority, profile, gates and channels for AI agents.	Bible corpus MCP server: scripture, Greek/Hebrew interlinear data, cross-refs, semantic search.
Category & Scope	Spirituality & Esoterica	Spirituality & Esoterica

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "human-design-mcp-server-by-roxyapi": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "human-design-mcp-server-by-roxyapi"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bible-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "fastembed"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons