Hubspot vs Servicegraph — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Hubspot vs Servicegraph
In-depth architectural comparison of the Hubspot and Servicegraph MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Hubspot
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 45/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Servicegraph
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 45/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Hubspot if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Servicegraph if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
H
Choose Hubspot when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Hubspot is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Servicegraph belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select Hubspot when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Servicegraph when you require tools for developer tools.
Browse all deals in your HubSpot workspace. Returns deal IDs, names, amounts, pipeline stages, and close dates. Paginate with limit and after parameters.
hs_get_deal
Fetch a deal's full details by ID. Returns deal name, amount, stage, owner, and linked contacts and companies.
Servicegraph Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.