Htmltext vs Html Parser AI MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Htmltext and Html Parser AI MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

H

Choose Htmltext when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: html_to_text, extract_links, extract_metadata.

Explore Htmltext Details

Choose Html Parser AI MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Html Parser AI MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	H Htmltext Developer Tools	Html Parser AI MCP Developer Tools
Summary	HTML → text MCP.	Html Parser Ai automation via MCP. Includes extract links, extract text, validate html. By M...
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "htmltext": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "html-parser-ai-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@smithery/cli@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons