HQBase vs Pigeonpost

In-depth architectural comparison of the HQBase and Pigeonpost MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose HQBase when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore HQBase Details

Choose Pigeonpost when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Pigeonpost Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	HQBase Communication	Pigeonpost Communication
Summary	Connect AI agents to your self-hosted HQBase shared email workspace.	Private asynchronous Pigeonpost messaging for AI agents over local MCP stdio.
Category & Scope	Communication	Communication
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hqbase": {
      "url": "https://hqbase.io/"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pigeonpost": {
      "url": "https://img.shields.io/github/license/bekirdag/pigeonpost"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons