Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
House Duck vs Suigar TypeScript SDKs
In-depth architectural comparison of the House Duck and Suigar TypeScript SDKs MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
House Duck
Gaming · Local stdio
Quality: 33/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Suigar TypeScript SDKs
Gaming · Local stdio
Quality: 44/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose House Duck if you need specialized Gaming tools running via a local process. Choose Suigar TypeScript SDKs if your workspace requires Gaming integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
H
Choose House Duck when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
S
Choose Suigar TypeScript SDKs when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Gaming domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
House Duck Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Suigar TypeScript SDKs Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
House Duck Configuration
Suigar TypeScript SDKs Configuration