Hoteloracle vs Rihla

In-depth architectural comparison of the Hoteloracle and Rihla MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Hoteloracle when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Travel & Transportation domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: hotel_search, cheapest_hotels, hotel_details.

Explore Hoteloracle Details

Choose Rihla when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Travel & Transportation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Rihla Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Hoteloracle Travel & Transportation	Rihla Travel & Transportation
Summary	Hotel Intelligence MCP — search, price compare, area guides, price calendars via Google Hotels	Flexible multi-leg, multi-airport flight search - cheapest valid combination across an itinerary.
Category & Scope	Travel & Transportation	Travel & Transportation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hoteloracle": {
      "url": "https://tooloracle.io/hotel/mcp/"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "rihla": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "rihla"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons