In-depth architectural comparison of the Hook Detector and Social → Context MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Hook Detector
Social Media · Local stdio
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Social → Context
Social Media · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Hook Detector if you need specialized Social Media tools running via a local process. Choose Social → Context if your workspace requires Social Media integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
H
Choose Hook Detector when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Hook Detector is categorized under Social Media and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Social → Context belongs to Social Media using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Hook Detector when you need capabilities focused on social media and Social → Context when you require tools for social media.