Hive Agent Kyc vs HiveTrust

In-depth architectural comparison of the Hive Agent Kyc and HiveTrust MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Hive Agent Kyc when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Hive Agent Kyc Details

H

Choose HiveTrust when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: hivetrust_register_agent, hivetrust_get_agent, hivetrust_verify_identity.

Explore HiveTrust Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Hive Agent Kyc Developer Tools	H HiveTrust Developer Tools
Summary	KYA agent identity verification and trust scoring for autonomous A2A networks	KYA identity verification, trust scoring, and performance bonds for AI agents
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hive-agent-kyc": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "hive-agent-kyc"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hivetrust": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "hivetrust"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons