Hitsteps Analytics and Operations vs MCP Ts Core

In-depth architectural comparison of the Hitsteps Analytics and Operations and MCP Ts Core MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

H

Choose Hitsteps Analytics and Operations when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Hitsteps Analytics and Operations Details

Choose MCP Ts Core when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MCP Ts Core Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	H Hitsteps Analytics and Operations Monitoring	MCP Ts Core Monitoring
Summary	Analyze Hitsteps analytics and manage websites, goals, uptime, alerts, and chats.	TypeScript framework for building MCP servers with declarative definitions and observability.
Category & Scope	Monitoring	Monitoring
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hitsteps-analytics-and-operations": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "hitsteps-analytics-and-operations"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-ts-core": {
      "command": "bunx",
      "args": [
        "@cyanheads/mcp-ts-core"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons