Hilma MCP vs Udbud Dk

In-depth architectural comparison of the Hilma MCP and Udbud Dk MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Hilma MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Hilma MCP Details

U

Choose Udbud Dk when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: dk_tender_search, dk_tender_recent, dk_tender_detail.

Explore Udbud Dk Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Hilma MCP Developer Tools	U Udbud Dk Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for Finnish public procurement notices (Hilma). Built by Aimiten.	Udbud.dk MCP — Danish government public procurement notices (keyless).
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hilma-mcp": {
      "url": "https://hankintailmoitukset.fi"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "udbud-dk": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons