Hevy MCP Server vs WHOOP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Hevy MCP Server and WHOOP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Hevy MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Hevy MCP Server Details

Choose WHOOP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore WHOOP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Hevy MCP Server Developer Tools	WHOOP Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for managing workouts, routines, and exercise data through the Hevy API	Your WHOOP data in the assistant, read-only: recovery, sleep, strain, workouts, cycles and body meas
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hevy-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "hevy-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "whoop": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "whoop"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons