Health Data (your own Supabase) vs Urlhaus

In-depth architectural comparison of the Health Data (your own Supabase) and Urlhaus MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Health Data (your own Supabase) when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_schema, get_sync_status, get_recent.

Explore Health Data (your own Supabase) Details

U

Choose Urlhaus when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: lookup_url, lookup_host, get_recent.

Explore Urlhaus Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Health Data (your own Supabase) Databases	U Urlhaus Databases
Summary	Your health data (weight, macros, weigh-ins) as MCP tools — in your own Supabase, zero custody.	URLhaus MCP — wraps abuse.ch URLhaus malware URL database (free, no auth)
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "health-data-your-own-supabase": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@almostjacked/health-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "urlhaus": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "urlhaus"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons