Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Engram vs Shodh Memory
In-depth architectural comparison of the Engram and Shodh Memory MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Engram
Knowledge & Memory · Local stdio
Quality: 59/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Shodh Memory
Knowledge & Memory · Local stdio
Quality: 55/100 (Good) | Auth: API Key required
Verdict Summary: Choose Engram if you need specialized Knowledge & Memory tools running via a local process. Choose Shodh Memory if your workspace requires Knowledge & Memory integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Engram when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
- Primary tools included: engram_remember, engram_recall, engram_forget.
Choose Shodh Memory when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
- You have access to required keys:
SHODH_API_KEY, SHODH_CONFIG_PATH, SHODH_DATA_DIR. - Primary tools included: Zero LLM calls for storing or recalling memories, Hebbian learning with memory strengthening and decay, Local semantic search using MiniLM embeddings.
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Engram Tools (6)
engram_remember
Store a memory with category, entity, confidence, namespace, tags. Auto-runs secret detection.
engram_recall
Hybrid semantic + FTS5 search. Supports `category`, `namespace`, `threshold`, and `time_filter`.
engram_forget
Delete a specific memory by ID.
engram_feedback
Vote a memory helpful/unhelpful. Drives the feedback loop above.
engram_context
Pre-formatted context block (`markdown` / `xml` / `json` / `plain`) with a token budget for system-prompt injection.
engram_status
Health check: memory count, model status, configuration.
Shodh Memory Tools (6)
Zero LLM calls for storing or recalling memories
Hebbian learning with memory strengthening and decay
Local semantic search using MiniLM embeddings
Named entity recognition and typed relation extraction
Causal lineage tracing via knowledge graph edges
Runs fully offline as a single ~17MB binary
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Engram Configuration
Shodh Memory Configuration