Engram vs Emulo

Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers — install paths, tools, quality signals, and directory engagement so you can pick the right one for Claude, Cursor, and other MCP clients.

Compare
Engram logo
Engram
HBarefoot
🧠 Knowledge & Memory
Emulo logo
Emulo
ohad6k
🧠 Knowledge & Memory
SummaryLocal-first persistent memory for AI agents. SQLite + local embeddings (all-MiniLM-L6-v2), hybrid semantic + FTS5 recall, secret detection, and contradiction handling. 6 MCP tools (remember, recall, forget, feedback, context, status) over stdio. Zero cloud, no API keys, fully offline. Works with Claude Desktop/Code, Cursor, and Windsurf. npm install -g @hbarefoot/engramLoads your personal profile, mined from your local Claude Code/Codex/OpenCode logs, so your agent works like you instead of a cold start. One tool, loademuloprofile. Run with uvx emulo mcp.
Quality signal53/100 (Fair)55/100 (Good)
Install pathnpx · highnpx · high
Engagement 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 216
ToolsLocal SQLite database with all-MiniLM-L6-v2 embeddingsHybrid semantic and FTS5 full-text search recallAutomatic secret detection on every write operationSix MCP-native tools: remember, recall, forget, feedback, context, statusFully offline operation with zero external dependenciesIn-process integration with no separate server or IPC overheadMines local AI coding session logs without uploading raw dataSupports multiple AI coding platforms including Claude Code, Codex, Copilot CLI, OpenCodeCreates layered profiles for task-specific agent behaviorIntegrates natively or through adapters with various AI agentsOperates locally with zero dependencies and MIT license
Verified / officialNoNo
Open listingView EngramView Emulo
More alternatives to EngramMore alternatives to EmuloKnowledge & Memory category

Other servers like Engram