Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
HasData Instagram vs HasData TikTok
In-depth architectural comparison of the HasData Instagram and HasData TikTok MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
HasData Instagram
Social Media · Local stdio
Quality: 41/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
HasData TikTok
Social Media · Local stdio
Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose HasData Instagram if you need specialized Social Media tools running via a local process. Choose HasData TikTok if your workspace requires Social Media integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
H
Choose HasData Instagram when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
H
Choose HasData TikTok when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
HasData Instagram Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
HasData TikTok Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
HasData Instagram Configuration
HasData TikTok Configuration