HasData Facebook vs YouTube MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the HasData Facebook and YouTube MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

H

Choose HasData Facebook when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: hasdata_facebook_profile_getFacebookProfile.

Explore HasData Facebook Details

Choose YouTube MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore YouTube MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	H HasData Facebook Social Media	YouTube MCP Social Media
Summary	Public Facebook pages and profiles with likes, followers, contact details and posts, as JSON.	Interact with public YouTube data via the official Data API v3
Category & Scope	Social Media	Social Media
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hasdata-facebook": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@hasdata/facebook-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "youtube-mcp-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@mrsknetwork/ytmcp@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons