HasData Facebook vs Bluesky MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the HasData Facebook and Bluesky MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

H

Choose HasData Facebook when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: hasdata_facebook_profile_getFacebookProfile.

Explore HasData Facebook Details

Choose Bluesky MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Bluesky MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	H HasData Facebook Social Media	Bluesky MCP Server Social Media
Summary	Public Facebook pages and profiles with likes, followers, contact details and posts, as JSON.	Search posts, profiles, feeds, threads, and trending topics on Bluesky.
Category & Scope	Social Media	Social Media
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hasdata-facebook": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@hasdata/facebook-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bluesky-mcp-server": {
      "command": "bunx",
      "args": [
        "@cyanheads/bluesky-mcp-server@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons