Telos vs Codegraphcontext — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Telos vs Codegraphcontext
A side-by-side look at the Telos and Codegraphcontext MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Telos for developer tools work as a local process; choose Codegraphcontext for developer tools as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Telos when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Codegraphcontext tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Telos is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. Codegraphcontext belongs to Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Telos for developer tools work and Codegraphcontext for developer tools.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Telos is listed as free. Auth: no auth required. Codegraphcontext is listed as free. Auth: no auth required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add harperz9-telos and shashankss1205-codegraphcontext as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Telos has a quality signal of 56/100 (Good) with 3 views, 0 installs and 4 GitHub stars. Codegraphcontext has 64/100 (Good) with 4 views, 0 installs and 4,270 GitHub stars.