Harness vs Qualys MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Harness and Qualys MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Harness when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Harness Details

Q

Choose Qualys MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Qualys MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Harness Developer Tools	Q Qualys MCP Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for Harness - Continuous delivery and cloud cost management	Full Qualys portal management over MCP: VMDR, PC, WAS, Cloud Agent, Container Security & more
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "harness": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "harness-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "qualys-mcp": {
      "url": "https://modelcontextprotocol.io"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons