Aeo Cli vs Open WebSearch

In-depth architectural comparison of the Aeo Cli and Open WebSearch MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Aeo Cli when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Scores LLM readiness from 0 to 100, Checks 13 AI crawler user agents in robots.txt, Detects llms.txt and llms-full.txt.

Explore Aeo Cli Details

Choose Open WebSearch when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Multi-engine web search without API keys, Structured titles, URLs, and descriptions, Web, Markdown, GitHub README, and CSDN fetching.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Aeo Cli hanselhansel Search & Data Extraction	Open WebSearch Aas-ee Search & Data Extraction
Summary	Audit URLs for AI crawler readiness — checks robots.txt, llms.txt, JSON-LD schema, and content density with 0-100 AEO scoring.	Web search using free multi-engine search (NO API KEYS REQUIRED) — Supports Bing, Baidu, DuckDuckGo, Brave, Exa, and CSDN.
Category & Scope	Search & Data Extraction

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hanselhansel-aeo-cli": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "context-linter"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "aas-ee-open-websearch": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "skills"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons