Hammerspoon MCP vs Krita Codex MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Hammerspoon MCP and Krita Codex MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

H

Choose Hammerspoon MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: hs_health, hs_api_search, hs_console_tail.

Explore Hammerspoon MCP Details

Choose Krita Codex MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Krita Codex MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	H Hammerspoon MCP Developer Tools	Krita Codex MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Control macOS through Hammerspoon: windows, apps, and API search. Injection-safe by design.	Control Krita through a secure local MCP server and authenticated Windows bridge.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "hammerspoon-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@vukvukovich/hammerspoon-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "krita-codex-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "--from"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons