HaloPSA vs Autotask

In-depth architectural comparison of the HaloPSA and Autotask MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

H

Choose HaloPSA when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore HaloPSA Details

Choose Autotask when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Autotask Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	H HaloPSA Developer Tools	Autotask Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for HaloPSA — clients, tickets, and PSA workflows via the HaloPSA REST API.	MCP server for Kaseya Autotask PSA — companies, tickets, projects, time entries, and more.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "halopsa-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "halopsa-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "autotask": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "github"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons