Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Hackertarget vs Maptiler
In-depth architectural comparison of the Hackertarget and Maptiler MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Hackertarget
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 35/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Maptiler
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 44/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Hackertarget if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Maptiler if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
H
Choose Hackertarget when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
M
Choose Maptiler when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
- Primary tools included: place.123456, coordinates, streets-v2.
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Hackertarget Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Maptiler Tools (3)
place.123456
coordinates
streets-v2
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Hackertarget Configuration
Maptiler Configuration