MCP Video Analyzer vs Heista

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Video Analyzer and Heista MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Video Analyzer when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Multimedia Process domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: analyze_video, analyze_videos, get_transcript.

Explore MCP Video Analyzer Details

Choose Heista when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Multimedia Process domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: OAuth 2.0 (Paid Service).
• Primary tools included: Per-call priced video ad decoding ($0.15-$0.20), Brand voice loading from a URL, documents, or both ($1-$2), Ad script generation in a specific brand's voice (~$0.02-$0.05/script).

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Video Analyzer guimatheus92 Multimedia Process	Heista Multimedia Process
Summary	MCP server for video analysis — extracts transcripts, key frames, OCR text, and annotated timelines from video URLs. Supports Loom and direct video files (.mp4, .webm). Zero auth required.	Decode video ads, load brand intelligence, generate ad scripts.
Category & Scope	Multimedia Process

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "guimatheus92-mcp-video-analyzer": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "guimatheus92-mcp-video-analyzer"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "heista": {
      "url": "https://www.heista.co/api/mcp/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons