Gryz vs Dochost MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Gryz and Dochost MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Gryz when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Gryz Details

Choose Dochost MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Dochost MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Gryz Developer Tools	Dochost MCP Developer Tools
Summary	Publish and manage shareable Markdown/HTML docs from any AI assistant. Free with a Gryz account.	Publish Markdown or HTML to a shareable link from your AI assistant. OAuth, no API keys.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "gryz": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "gryz"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dochost-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "dochost-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons