Ground Motion vs Nasa Firms

In-depth architectural comparison of the Ground Motion and Nasa Firms MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Ground Motion when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aerospace & Astrodynamics domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ground Motion Details

N

Choose Nasa Firms when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aerospace & Astrodynamics domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Nasa Firms Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Ground Motion Aerospace & Astrodynamics	N Nasa Firms Aerospace & Astrodynamics
Summary	Measured ground motion (mm/yr, sinking or uplift) per US address, from NASA Sentinel-1 InSAR	NASA FIRMS MCP — active-fire / thermal-anomaly detections from MODIS and VIIRS.
Category & Scope	Aerospace & Astrodynamics	Aerospace & Astrodynamics

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ground-motion": {
      "url": "https://sibfly.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nasa-firms": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "nasa-firms"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons