Ground Motion vs Nasa

In-depth architectural comparison of the Ground Motion and Nasa MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Ground Motion when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aerospace & Astrodynamics domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Ground Motion Details

N

Choose Nasa when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aerospace & Astrodynamics domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_apod, get_asteroids, get_mars_photos.

Explore Nasa Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Ground Motion Aerospace & Astrodynamics	N Nasa Aerospace & Astrodynamics
Summary	Measured ground motion (mm/yr, sinking or uplift) per US address, from NASA Sentinel-1 InSAR	NASA MCP — wraps NASA Open APIs (api.nasa.gov)
Category & Scope	Aerospace & Astrodynamics	Aerospace & Astrodynamics
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ground-motion": {
      "url": "https://sibfly.com"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nasa": {
      "url": "https://pipeworx.io"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons