Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Graphql vs Urantia Papers
In-depth architectural comparison of the Graphql and Urantia Papers MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Graphql
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 40/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Urantia Papers
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Graphql if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Urantia Papers if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
G
Choose Graphql when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
U
Choose Urantia Papers when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Graphql Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Urantia Papers Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Graphql Configuration
Urantia Papers Configuration